@article {67286,
	title = {Negotiating a Principled Peace Based on Historic Compromise},
	journal = {Israel Horizons},
	year = {2008},
	note = {Download PDF},
	month = {Aug 1, 2008},
	publisher = {Meretz USA},
	abstract = {There are good reasons to be skeptical{\textemdash}even cynical{\textemdash}about the outcome of the Annapolis Conference and pessimistic about the prospects of achieving a negotiated agreement by the end of this year. Yet, granting the vagueness of the commitments made in Annapolis and the discouraging effect of subsequent actions on the ground that have undermined the peace process, the conference has opened up the best opportunity since the failure of the Camp David summit for a return to a serious negotiation of a final agreement on a two-state solution. I saw such an opportunity, for example, in a February statement by Haim Ramon that Israel hoped to reach agreement with its Palestinian negotiating partners by the end of 2008 on a \&quot;declaration of principles\&quot; for peace, but not on a detailed peace treaty.},
	url = {http://www.meretzusa.org/},
	author = {Kelman, Herbert C.}
}
