Date:
Location:
"The Crisis of Constitutional Democracy in Pandemic Times"
Attend this event via Zoom (advance registration required)
Speaker:
Neil Walker, Regius Professor of Public Law and the Law of Nature and Nations, Edinburgh Law School.
Panelists:
Joyce Chaplin, James Duncan Phillips Professor of Early American History, Department of History, Harvard University.
Ben Hurlbut, Associate Professor, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University.
Douglas Kysar, Joseph M. Field ’55 Professor of Law, Yale Law School.
Moderator:
Sheila Jasanoff, Faculty Associate. Pforzheimer Professor of Science and Technology Studies, Harvard Kennedy School.
Remote Access Information:
To join by computer:
https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/6316030685007/WN_ZqJUDN_DTzKriLFWrjyL9A
Please note: This event requires registration in advance to receive the meeting link and password.
Abstract:
The word ‘crisis’ has two different shades of meaning. It can refer to an unstable situation in political or social affairs that persists and intensifies over the relatively long term. Closer to the original Greek meaning of krisis, a crisis also refers to a traumatic episode or condition whose resolution remains unclear and replete with danger. The crisis of democratic leadership is a crisis of the first sort — a slow burn tending towards meltdown. The coronavirus pandemic is a crisis of the second sort — a traumatic event spiraling into an uncertain and perilous future. The crisis of the first sort is currently feeding into and feeding off the crisis of the second sort. COVID-19 has had an extraordinary effect on the political landscape. Its challenge to democratic leadership and to the paradigm of representative democracy more generally may be framed according to a number of key features. First, the pandemic may be considered as a premonitory event. Secondly, it poses various acute problems of collective action, both within and beyond the polity. Thirdly, it highlights the dense interconnectedness of the issues that form our political agenda. And fourthly, it suspends many aspects of social and political life, both pausing our capacity to act and interrupting the flow of the world we act upon. Each of these features has double-edged implications for our capacity to steer our democracies. Each threatens to reinforce democratic impotence, but at the margins each also offers some hope of democratic renewal.
