Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2005. “
It’s the women, stupid.” Women’s Rights. New York: H. W. Wilson Co.
This paper seeks to explain the continuing strength of religious values and the vitality of spiritual life in the United States compared with many other rich nations. Part I documents these patterns using a wealth of survey evidence and Part II then considers three alternative explanations of these differences. Religious market theory postulates that intense competition between rival denominations generates a ferment of activity explaining the vitality of churchgoing. Functionalist explanations focus on the shrinking social role of religious institutions, following the growth of the welfare state and the public sector. We compare evidence supporting these accounts with the theory of secure secularization, based on societal modernization, human development, and economic inequality, that lies at the heart of this study. This study draws on a massive base of new evidence generated by the four waves of the World Values Survey executed from 1981 to 2001. This includes representative national surveys in almost eighty societies, covering all of the world?s major faiths. We also examine other evidence concerning religiosity from multiple sources, including Gallup International polls, the International Social Survey Program, and Eurobarometer surveys. The conclusions consider the broader implications of the findings for the role of faith in politics, for patterns of secularization worldwide, and for growing cultural divisions between Europe and the United States.
Download PDFIn Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide, by Pippa Norris and Ronald Inglehart. UK: Cambridge University Press, September 2005.
Since the early 1970s, my colleagues and I have been actively engaged in track–two efforts designed to contribute to the resolution of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Our work has primarily involved the intensive application to this conflict of the concepts and methods of interactive problem solving (Kelman, 1998b, 2002), which is my particular variant of interactive conflict resolution. Interactive problem solving is an unofficial, third–party approach to the resolution of international and intercommunal conflicts, derived from work of John Burton (1969, 1979, 1984, 1987) and anchored in social–psychological principles (Kelman, 1997a).
1048_hck_interactiveproblemsolving.pdf